NASDAQ 100 · DCA since 2009

$500/month in NASDAQ 100 since 2009

What a monthly $500 dollar-cost average into NASDAQ 100 would be worth today if you'd started in January 2009 and never stopped. Real adjusted closes, T+1 execution, no transaction fees modeled.

If you invested $500/month in NASDAQ 100 from 2009-01 to 2026-06...

$710,159

grown from $105,000 invested over 17.5 years. +$605,159 (+576.34%)

Growth over time

Dashed: cumulative invested · Solid: portfolio value

Investment schedule

Per investment
$500.00
Frequency
Monthly
Window
2009-01-01 → 2026-06-29
Duration
17.5 years
Number of investments
210
× $500.00 each

Results

Total invested
$105,000
210 × $500.00
Final value
$710,159
as of 2026-06-29
Total return
+$605,159
+576.34%
Annualized (IRR)
19.22%/yr
compounded over 17.5 years

What 2009 actually was: at the bottom

Investors starting in 2009 caught the V-shaped recovery from one of the deepest crashes in 80 years. Within five years, the indexes had doubled. Within fifteen, they'd quintupled. The 2009 start is the dream entry point. The catch: almost no one started then. The headlines were terrifying and recession felt permanent. The DCA people just kept buying.

For a NASDAQ 100 DCA buyer who started January 2009 with $500 a month, the schedule pulled in 210 purchases through 2026-06-29. Total invested: $105,000. Final value: $710,159. That works out to an annualized return of 19.22% per year on the irregular cashflow series.

The numbers above use adjusted closing prices (dividends reinvested, splits applied) and apply a T+1 policy: when the 1st of the month landed on a weekend or holiday, the trade executed at the next trading day's close. Bitcoin pages execute on the exact scheduled date because crypto trades 24/7.

Change the numbers

Want to test a different amount, frequency, or end date? The full calculator has the same NASDAQ 100 dataset behind it.

Other NASDAQ 100 start years

Disclaimer: This page is for educational purposes only. It is not investment advice. Historical performance does not predict future results. Always do your own research.